5 Minutes Read Time
There’s a popular quote that says, “You can become everything you criticise.” It’s meant as a caution, reminding us that judgment can sometimes reflect hidden tendencies in ourselves. And in some cases, this is true; people who spend their lives attacking others often end up mirroring the very flaws they despise.
But like most blanket statements, it isn’t always true. Criticism doesn’t automatically turn into imitation. Sometimes, criticism creates clarity, boundaries, and even the strength to move in the opposite direction.
One of the strongest arguments against this quote is the way people use criticism to draw lines in the sand. When someone criticises a harmful behaviour, they are not always secretly drawn to it; often, they are deeply repelled by it.
Take the example of drug abuse. A young woman might criticise the destructive lifestyle of her older brother, who struggles with addiction. She sees how it breaks their family apart, drains their finances, and leaves emotional scars. Her criticism doesn’t mean she will eventually walk the same path. Instead, it fortifies her choice to stay far away from drugs. She channels her pain into advocacy, perhaps even volunteering to educate others about the dangers of substance abuse.
For her, criticism is not a reflection; it’s resistance.
Another flaw in the quote is that it underestimates the power of deeply held values. People can condemn certain actions not because they are secretly tempted by them, but because their moral compass won’t allow it.
Think about corruption. In many societies, corruption is widespread, and it’s easy to feel cynical about leaders who misuse power. But a person who criticises corruption passionately may never embody it. Why? Because they have a moral anchor, whether it comes from faith, upbringing, or personal integrity.
The same applies to issues like domestic violence. Someone who grew up criticising abusive behaviour in their home may go on to break that cycle completely. They may dedicate their life to building safe, respectful relationships, precisely because they know firsthand the pain that abuse causes.
In these cases, criticism is rooted in strong principles. It’s less about judgment and more about conviction.
There’s also an entire category of criticism that exists purely for accountability. Critics, journalists, analysts, and watchdogs play important roles in society by pointing out flaws, injustices, and weaknesses. To suggest that every time they criticise, they are bound to become what they criticise is not only inaccurate, it’s unfair.
A journalist who criticises a politician for dishonesty is not necessarily a liar. A food critic who points out unhygienic practices in a restaurant is not going to open a filthy kitchen. An environmental activist who criticises oil companies for pollution is not secretly planning to run one.
In these cases, criticism is part of a professional or civic duty. It’s not about hypocrisy, but about creating pressure for better standards.
Perhaps the most powerful counterpoint to the quote is the way criticism can inspire transformation — not into the criticised behaviour, but into its opposite.
Consider a child who grows up under neglectful parents. They may spend their teenage years criticising their parents, saying things like, “You were never there for me,” or “You never paid attention to my needs.” Now, according to the quote, this child is at risk of becoming a neglectful parent themselves. And while that does happen in some cases, it is not inevitable.
For many, that criticism becomes a motivator. They consciously decide to parent differently. They attend every school play, every soccer game, every bedtime story, because they want to be the opposite of what they criticised. Their words of disappointment in their parents fuel their determination to break the cycle.
Here, criticism doesn’t lead to imitation. It leads to growth.
Now, the quote isn’t completely without merit. There are situations where people become what they criticise, usually because their criticism is rooted in judgment, ego, or denial rather than conviction.
For example, someone who harshly criticises others for arrogance may secretly crave recognition themselves. Over time, their judgment masks an inner desire, and they eventually fall into the same pattern.
Or think about the preacher who rails against sin but is later exposed for the very behaviour he condemned. In such cases, the quote serves as a reminder of the dangers of pride, projection, and a lack of self-awareness.
But these are situations where criticism is shallow, not anchored in values, but in appearances.
So, where does this leave us? Should we throw the quote away entirely? Not necessarily. It has its place as a warning against hypocrisy and unchecked judgment. But it cannot be treated as an unshakable rule of life.
The fuller truth might sound something like this:
Sometimes you become what you criticise, if your criticism is rooted in projection or pride. But just as often, criticism becomes the very reason you don’t repeat the same mistakes.
It’s not about the act of criticising itself, but about the heart and intention behind it.
Life is full of quotes that sound universal but only capture half the story. “You can become everything you criticise” is one of them. Yes, it warns us to be cautious about judgment and self-righteousness. But it doesn’t account for resilience, conviction, and the human ability to grow in the opposite direction of what we reject.
At the end of the day, criticism can be a mirror, but it can also be a compass. For some, it exposes hidden flaws they later embody. For others, it sharpens their values and prevents them from repeating destructive patterns.
So the next time you find yourself criticising something, don’t panic about becoming it. Instead, ask yourself: Am I criticising to judge, or am I criticising to learn and create change?
Because maybe the real truth is this: you don’t always become what you criticise. Sometimes, you become stronger because of it.
Leave a Reply